|
Aptos High School violated the families of 360 students when it conducted a secret behavioral control exercise that compelled the students to publicly confess their sexual behaviors, personal thoughts, and family secrets, according to "Crossing the Line crosses the line" in the Santa Cruz Sentinel. AHS dismissed its violation of law and family autonomy as an "oversight" and expects the story to stop there. It doesn't.
Some of the rest of the story
AHS and the business with which the administration contracts to conduct behavior control and social engineering programs on campus have failed to provide curriculum materials for parent review. They continue to conduct the programs without parental notification. So, it took some digging for F21SC to uncover some important information that all Santa Cruz County parents should review before allowing their children to participate in Breaking Down the Walls, Link Crew, or other diversity training programs being conducted on their children in government schools.
Highlights of available resources
Following are highlights of the articles, commentary, and news stories F21SC has found related to the behavior control and social engineering programs being conducted on Santa Cruz County school children. If you have additional information or would like to suggest changes or corrections, please complete our feedback form.
- Adult strangers and youth trainees in the schools are asking children to publicly disclose and discuss their sexual thoughts and behaviors, and to provide other intimate information about themselves, their parents, and their families. This is done with neither parental permission nor knowledge, a violation of district policy and state law. More>
- The schools and the business that conducts psychological encounter sessions on SC County campuses have failed to produce any curriculum materials, even after repeated requests by parents for them to comply with policy. However, an anonymous source has provided F21SC with the questions strangers are asking children at your school. More>
- The Seattle Times says that "schools should not endorse psycho-fests" like the Breaking Down the Wall program because they are "soul-searching" "brainwashing" exercises that can cause a child irreparable emotional damage, and create a "legal mess" for the schools. More>
- Parents in the Seattle area are suing the school districts and the businesses that conduct the behavior control programs for conducting "emotionally abusive" "psycho cry fests" on their children with neither their knowledge nor permission. More>
- A reporter for Creators Syndicate has found that other organizations using the Cross the Line exercise "have been connected to a shady racket of companies peddling kiddie rehab programs that have been accused of brainwashing youngsters." More>
- A national news story featuring AHS Crossing the Line exercise. "Once, the function of the school was to prepare each student to reach his maximum individual potential. Now, school has become a process to modify behavior, attitudes and beliefs in pursuit of a "tolerant," (read: obedient) society." More >
- A professor of organizational behavior comments on how programs like Breaking Down the Walls work by breaking down the will of a developing mind so it can be rebuilt according to the values of a collective or organization -- a process that builds walls between parents and their children. When the same techniques are used by cults, they build walls between children and society for the greater good of the collective. More>
- The executive director of the National Education Consortium discusses how the government education system has become an "illiteracy cartel" which is built around an out-of-control psychographic consulting industry. More>
- A leading behavioral scientists says diversity indoctrination programs, like Breaking Down the Walls and Link Crew, are highly divisive and racist; he recommends a proven method for solving the problems the SC County schools are trying to correct. More>
- Two leading psychiatrists discuss how diversity indoctrination programs have actually encouraged and institutionalized the bigotry and societal divisions they say they're trying to cure. More>
- A former Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, exposes how government education programs are designed to socialize and control, not educate, children. More>
- Failing to inform parents of controversial subject matter in the curriculum seems to be more of a practice than an oversight, as with this example where a California government school is being sued for a workshop in which 13-year olds who didn't support risky sexual behaviors were subjected to ridicule by faculty and students. More>
- The organizations that put on the sessions justify their program by promoting that it works to break down a child's defense, safety, and pride for the "greater good". More>
- Breaking Down the Walls and Crossing the Line are solitary examples from a county-wide agenda to "enlist and empower children and youth in reaching" a social agenda. More>
- The County education program is based on a global agenda to "Advancing the role of youth and actively involving them in... social development." More>
|
